Michal C(ihar( a écrit:
On Thu 14. 10. 2004 14:25, Marc Delisle wrote:
Good work! except I would remove the references to xine ;)
Oops, sure, it was just an example :-). Fixed version attached.
I can post this in a few hours, as a news item with a reference to Documentation.html where we already have a security section.
I'd drop it and replace all these stuff with link to security section on our web. Simply documentation can't cover bugs that will appear later, so you usually need actual information for security issues.
So you think that users, reading the security information in a document that is clearly labeled as being for 2.6.0-pl2, will conclude that there won't be any bugs or security announcements later? I am not sure to agree with you.
Besides, we have localized versions of the doc for some languages. It would be interesting to have the localized version of the security alerts too.
Also, I find it important that the documents we produce be in the CVS, especially for matters about security.
But I am not against a new Security section, with relevant links.
Marc