2013/7/8 Ayush Chaudhary <ayushchd(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 8:41 PM, Madhura Jayaratne wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Ayush Chaudhary <ayushchd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dieter Adriaenssens wrote:
2013/7/3 Ayush Chaudhary <ayushchd(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
Is there a reason why validation.lib.php is not a class with public static
method? Is it okay to convert it to a class with all methods' access
specifier as public static?
Did you mean the PMA_SQLValidator class in
libraries/sqlvalidator.class.php? I didn't find a validation.lib.php,
or something similar, in the PMA codebase, that contains a class.
(libraries/config/validate.lib.php doesn't contain a class)
Sorry for not being clear. I was referring to the library
libraries/config/validate.lib.php. I am currently writing tests for
libraries/config/FormDisplay.class.php, and there are numerous calls to
functions from validate.lib.php which cannot be mocked because they are not
contained in a class. Also, the same issue holds for
libraries/config/FormDisplay.tpl.php
I am in favor of putting these functions into a class as static methods.
Waiting for more confirmations :)
I agree too.
BTW : In an ideal world, everyone on this mailing list, or at least
the core developers would have voted in favor or against. In practice,
if nobody objects within a few days, it is a silent agreement. ;)
Kind regards,
Dieter Adriaenssens