On 17 March 2015 at 17:48, Smita kumarismita62@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Atul Pratap Singh < atulpratapsingh05@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12 March 2015 at 23:47, Smita kumarismita62@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info wrote:
Hi devs, As a follow-up to [0], should we manually mark old tickets (older than the current version) as being "out of date", or should it be done automatically by the reporting server, or none of these?
Hi
I think doing it manually will be very tedious. It would be better if its done from the server itself, may be a mysql query can be written to mark old tickets "out of date".
Indeed, a query will be needed to do it manually, maybe the issue is
more about whether we should do it automatically as well for the newly coming reports which belong for older versions?
It seems, I misunderstood the question. Thanks Atul for clarifying. I think, It would be better if it is marked outdated automatically by reporting server. BTW do we need to keep the older reports (outdated marked ones) on our server? May be, we can remove the ones which are older by 5-6 versions?
I agree about automatically marking reports as "outdated" for versions
older by a certain number of releases. But, if we remove them completely, I think we won't be able to find them at all, so unless it is making the server slow? I think we can keep them. Also after this year's gsoc project I hope it will become faster and with some state maintenance and persistent settings, the sheer number of reports won't come in our way when using it.