20 Feb
2006
20 Feb
'06
6:31 a.m.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:15:30 +0100 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
except this three all others seems just translated chars, the above are just seems to be the unabbreviated writing
Probably yes, it should be fixed.
looking through different wikipedia pages (langs) makes me think that this is not right!
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/2%E9%80%B2%E6%8E%A5%E9%A0%AD%E8%BE%9E http://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%... http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%A9fixe_binaire
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin%C3%A1rn%C3%AD_p%C5%99edpona ;-)
aso.
... but we have to rely on the translators ...
Yes we have to. Do not forget that Wikipedia is also not 100% perfect source of information.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com