Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:35:15 -0400 Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info napsal(a):
any objection about integrating fckeditor[0] to TEXT field in insert/edit modes?
Not unconditionally. I would prefer to have transformation options also for editing, so that you can use wysiwig editor for HTML, but not only limiting to this.
PS: I more prefer TinyMCE.
I think that transformations require the PMADB mechanism? so more users would not have access to them by default. Also, I would not be in favor of having more than one such editor integrated.
Do you have other "transformations" in mind for this case? Note that currently, with the display options (in browse mode), user has a certain latitude for display.
Also, transformations imply some API we have to prepare, with the idea of attracting developers; so I wonder if we can have an API generic enough in this case. It probably depends on what other transformations would be supported.
Marc