Marc:
Since you say you will be working on the relation stuff, I have a suggestion:
Can we rename the field names in the relation table to something easier to understand? Source and Destination don't work for me. How about Primary and Foreign? That is:
pri_table pri_field for_table for_field
or pkey_*, fkey_*
Or something like this.
What do others think?
Jay
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002, Marc Delisle DelislMa@CollegeSherbrooke.qc.ca wrote:
Hi devs,
Let's discuss the game plan for 2.3.0.
Merge the patches currently from the tracker
Merge/code the new db-based config
code some new features (I will be working on MyISAM options, and InnoDB
support, + the Relation stuff
- interface: it's about time we split the pages: db_detail and
tbl_properties.
Suggestions for the tbl_properties split
generally, we move large sections of tbl_properties to seperate pages
an [Export] link at the top, calling a page with the "view dump" dialog
an [Attributes] link, for Alter table order by, Comments, Table type,
and the upcoming MyISAM options (and InnoDB)
- an [Operations] link, for Rename, Move, Copy, Maintenance (4 items),
Flush, Drop (maybe Insert data from a file)
a [Structure] link, to show Fields and Indexes, + the Add field
(not sure about this) by default, users clicking on a table name would
see the familiar Browse, Select, Insert, Empty, Drop + the 4 new links, at the top, but not the structure. I find that most of the time, I don't want to see the structure, I just want to type queries, use bookmarks, and be able to use the other main links.
- a right/top-frame for the links?
Please comment.
-- Marc Delisle
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel