Le lun. 5 oct. 2015 à 22:07, Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info a écrit :
Le 2015-10-05 13:46, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 21:13, Hugues Peccatte <hugues.peccatte@gmail.com mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com> a écrit :
Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Remi Collet <remi@fedoraproject.org <mailto:remi@fedoraproject.org>> a écrit :Le 03/10/2015 09:14, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
Dear developers,
The following PR is trying to use namespaces and autoloading for pMA: https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/pull/11428 This PR seems to be quite stable now. As almost all PHP files had been updated, this is a huge work to test all cases, all
configurations,
all features. Would it be possible to have some testers please?
At a first (and quick) look
PMA\libraries namespace seems a bit uggly...
'libraries' is a directory, only a layout artefact, why should it be part of the namespace.
Per PSR-4 definition, namespace should be
"The fully qualified class name MUST have a top-level namespace name, also known as a "vendor namespace".So, is PMA the "vendor" ? it seems.
"The fully qualified class name MAY have one or more sub-namespace names."I think a second level is needed (but again, "libraries" seems strange to me... but perhaps only to me)
Notice: it will be nice to move all 3rd party lib to a separate directory (will make downstream work much easier)
Remi.
Thanks to Marc and Isaac who already did a lot of tests. And
thanks
to new testers.
Have a nice day,
H.
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@phpmyadmin.net mailto:Developers@phpmyadmin.net https://lists.phpmyadmin.net/mailman/listinfo/developers
Hi Remi, Thanks for your feedback. Why does PMA\libraries seem ugly? OK, "libraries" is a directory, but all classes are not in libraries, that's why I decided to set the vendor namespace (PMA) at project root. If needed, we can imagine to have a specific vendor namespace for libraries, but why and which one? I saw your notice about moving 3rd party libraries. But I think this is not the subject here. In fact, this is a really huge work that had been done (at least, I think…) and I think that a lot of subjects could be discussed here. That's why I'ld like to focus on test and errors. Had you some time to test the PR? Thanks, H.Hi,
Any other feedback please? Or maybe we can merge…
Seems ready indeed.
-- Marc Delisle | phpMyAdmin
Hi,
Thanks for your answer Marc. I'll merge again master in the branch and then it should be OK. Do you want me to do the merge (by GitHub)?
H.