Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 21:13, Hugues Peccatte
<hugues.peccatte(a)gmail.com
<mailto:hugues.peccatte@gmail.com>> a écrit :
Le sam. 3 oct. 2015 à 12:46, Remi Collet <remi(a)fedoraproject.org
<mailto:remi@fedoraproject.org>> a écrit :
Le 03/10/2015 09:14, Hugues Peccatte a écrit :
Dear developers,
The following PR is trying to use namespaces and
autoloading for
pMA:
https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/pull/11428 This PR
seems to be quite stable now. As almost all PHP files had been
updated, this is a huge work to test all cases, all
configurations,
all features. Would it be possible to have some
testers please?
At a first (and quick) look
PMA\libraries namespace seems a bit uggly...
'libraries' is a directory, only a layout artefact, why should it be
part of the namespace.
Per PSR-4 definition, namespace should be
"The fully qualified class name MUST have a top-level
namespace name, also known as a "vendor namespace".
So, is PMA the "vendor" ? it seems.
"The fully qualified class name MAY have one or
more sub-namespace names."
I think a second level is needed (but again, "libraries" seems
strange
to me... but perhaps only to me)
Notice: it will be nice to move all 3rd party lib to a separate
directory (will make downstream work much easier)
Remi.
Thanks to Marc and Isaac who already did a lot of
tests. And
thanks
to new testers.
Have a nice day,
H.
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing
list Developers(a)phpmyadmin.net <mailto:Developers@phpmyadmin.net>
https://lists.phpmyadmin.net/mailman/listinfo/developers
Hi Remi,
Thanks for your feedback.
Why does PMA\libraries seem ugly?
OK, "libraries" is a directory, but all classes are not in
libraries, that's why I decided to set the vendor namespace (PMA) at
project root. If needed, we can imagine to have a specific vendor
namespace for libraries, but why and which one?
I saw your notice about moving 3rd party libraries. But I think this
is not the subject here.
In fact, this is a really huge work that had been done (at least, I
think…) and I think that a lot of subjects could be discussed here.
That's why I'ld like to focus on test and errors.
Had you some time to test the PR?
Thanks,
H.
Hi,
Any other feedback please? Or maybe we can merge…