Le 2012-03-12 13:53, Chanaka Dharmarathna a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info wrote:
Le 2012-03-12 05:55, Chanaka Dharmarathna a écrit :
Hi All,
I'm interested on working the feature request [1]. As I understood, it
is
requested to link each result, which shows after browsing (click brows)
any
field in table structure, to relevant data row in that table. Please make me correct if I'm wrong.
But if the browsing row is already a link, due to that field has a
relation
with another table field, what should be the behavior of this feature. My suggestion is to without bothering the column already a link or not, add
a
new link as 'show data row' after click on corresponding cells. If you
have
any suggestions please inform me to make some improvements. As well it is very helpful for me if you can suggest some source files related to these feature.
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2998185&gro...
Regards !
Hi, first, are you aware that this feature request refers to the "browse distinct value" action, not the browse action?
Click on a table, then Structure, then under More, click Browse distinct values.
In the results panel, I could not find a situation where there are links.
-- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Hi Marc,
I mean the same thing which you have described. I'll describe you what
is the scenario I mentioned.
- We have a Company which buys Car from several companies and sells to
customers.
- We have 5 tables in our database. company, car, customer, sales and
source_of_supply.
- Source of Supply table has n:m relationship (Company - Car)
- Sales table has n:m relationship (Customer - Car)
While browsing distinct values of car_id or company_id in structure of the source_of_supply table, each data appear as a link. If I click on it, a drop down appear with the possible values in a pop up, and the link for corresponding company or car can be appear in that pop up. Same thing for the sales table. Hope you can understand the described scenario and hoping any suggestions.
Regards !
Hi Chanaka, Your suggestion makes sense but it will be easier to decide when seeing the implementation.