Hi,
I am ready to release this Sunday morning (EST which is UTC-5 hours), unless someone sees a showstopper.
Marc
Hi All!
I just stumbled accross 735375, which is really nagging be because I didn't think that this behaviour is only for PHP > 4.3.0 version. But I wouldn't declare it as a showstopper.
In my opinion, when 734104 can be fixed, we should head for a release.
Regards, Garvin.
Michal Cihar wrote:
On Friday 09 of May 2003 19:27, Marc Delisle wrote:
I am ready to release this Sunday morning (EST which is UTC-5 hours), unless someone sees a showstopper.
I hope I will be able to fix #734104 during tomorrow (Saturday) so it seems okay for me.
Michal
Michal,
can you reproduce #734104 ?
Marc
On Friday 09 of May 2003 22:12, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Cihar wrote:
On Friday 09 of May 2003 19:27, Marc Delisle wrote:
I am ready to release this Sunday morning (EST which is UTC-5 hours), unless someone sees a showstopper.
I hope I will be able to fix #734104 during tomorrow (Saturday) so it seems okay for me.
Michal
Michal,
can you reproduce #734104 ?
Yes, it happens when exporting from db to CSV. Solution is to disable this option for now, as it doesn't make much sense to put more tables into one CSV file. I have fix, as CVS will work, I will commit it...
Hi
On Saturday 10 of May 2003 11:11, Michal Cihar wrote:
CSV file. I have fix, as CVS will work, I will commit it...
It wasn't CVS, but my ISP problem, commited.
Hi Marc & list,
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Delisle
I am ready to release this Sunday morning (EST which is UTC-5 hours), unless someone sees a showstopper.
Just one thing: did anyone test a recent CVS version of PMA with php 3.0.x and / or MySQL 3.21.x? The point is: if we declare 2.5.0 as the last version that supports php3 and MySQL 3.21, did anyone verify that it really does?
Regards,
Alexander M. Turek alex@bugfixes.info
+-----------------------------+ | The phpMyAdmin Project | | http://www.phpmyadmin.net | | rabus@users.sourceforge.net | +-----------------------------+ | [bugfixes.info] | | http://www.bugfixes.info | | rabus@bugfixes.info | +-----------------------------+
Hi!
Just one thing: did anyone test a recent CVS version of PMA with php 3.0.x and / or MySQL 3.21.x? The point is: if we declare 2.5.0 as the last version that supports php3 and MySQL 3.21, did anyone verify that it really does?
There's this MySQL bug where the 'Comments'-rows from show table status only works with 3.23.00 or so, but the original bug poster didn't respond to the possible solution, I guess.
And, I didn't test 3.21 / 3.0 :-]
Regards, Garvin.
Hi Garvin & list,
-----Original Message----- From: Garvin Hicking
There's this MySQL bug where the 'Comments'-rows from show table status only works with 3.23.00 or so, but the original bug poster didn't respond to the possible solution, I guess.
I remember having fixed such a bug during the 2.5.0 development.
Alexander M. Turek alex@bugfixes.info
+-----------------------------+ | The phpMyAdmin Project | | http://www.phpmyadmin.net | | rabus@users.sourceforge.net | +-----------------------------+ | [bugfixes.info] | | http://www.bugfixes.info | | rabus@bugfixes.info | +-----------------------------+
Rabus a écrit:
Hi Marc & list,
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Delisle
I am ready to release this Sunday morning (EST which is UTC-5 hours), unless someone sees a showstopper.
Just one thing: did anyone test a recent CVS version of PMA with php 3.0.x and / or MySQL 3.21.x? The point is: if we declare 2.5.0 as the last version that supports php3 and MySQL 3.21, did anyone verify that it really does?
Regards,
Alexander M. Turek alex@bugfixes.info
I cannot test this, but what we declare is that we won't support PHP 3 and MySQL 3.21 after phpMyAdmin 2.5.x.
Here the x is important, opening the door to 2.5.1.
Marc
Hi Marc & list,
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Delisle
I cannot test this, but what we declare is that we won't support PHP 3 and MySQL 3.21 after phpMyAdmin 2.5.x.
Here the x is important, opening the door to 2.5.1.
I'm a little confused: Haven't we planned to drop the php 3 / MySQL 3.21 support after 2.5.0? I suggested to do so on 2003-03-16 12:17. Garving replied: "I like the idea of leaving phpMyAdmin 2.5.0 the last release for older version compatibility." And then you yourself wrote as reply to Garvin's message: "I also agree with Rabus about the new requirements of PHP and MySQL (after 2.5.0)."
Continuing the support for php 3 / MySQL 3.21 although we have no test machines is just insane, imho.
Anyway, haven't we planned to start the session based rewrite, now?
Regards,
Alexander M. Turek alex@bugfixes.info
+-----------------------------+ | The phpMyAdmin Project | | http://www.phpmyadmin.net | | rabus@users.sourceforge.net | +-----------------------------+ | [bugfixes.info] | | http://www.bugfixes.info | | rabus@bugfixes.info | +-----------------------------+
Rabus a écrit:
Hi Marc & list,
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Delisle
I cannot test this, but what we declare is that we won't support PHP 3 and MySQL 3.21 after phpMyAdmin 2.5.x.
Here the x is important, opening the door to 2.5.1.
I'm a little confused: Haven't we planned to drop the php 3 / MySQL 3.21 support after 2.5.0? I suggested to do so on 2003-03-16 12:17. Garving replied: "I like the idea of leaving phpMyAdmin 2.5.0 the last release for older version compatibility." And then you yourself wrote as reply to Garvin's message: "I also agree with Rabus about the new requirements of PHP and MySQL (after 2.5.0)."
Continuing the support for php 3 / MySQL 3.21 although we have no test machines is just insane, imho.
Anyway, haven't we planned to start the session based rewrite, now?
Regards,
Alexander M. Turek alex@bugfixes.info
The new 3.x branch will be PHP4 only, but the 2.5.x branch can live as well, with bugfixes only, for some time.
The reason is that 3.0.0 is many months ahead, I think.
And PHP3 users are reporting problems to us, so we can fix them even if we don't have PHP3.
Just my opinion :)
Marc
Hi All!
I'd like to apply my patch #725839, which makes it possible to nest tables into groups. The patch was basically tested and performs fine on my machine. Even though I'd have to declare it 'beta', so are there any objections for putting it in at the current stage?
Regards, Garvin.
Hi Garvin,
Ok for me, as I like the idea very much.
Marc
Garvin Hicking a écrit:
Hi All!
I'd like to apply my patch #725839, which makes it possible to nest tables into groups. The patch was basically tested and performs fine on my machine. Even though I'd have to declare it 'beta', so are there any objections for putting it in at the current stage?
Regards, Garvin.
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
Hi Garvin
On 12.05.2003 19:02, Garvin Hicking wrote:
I'd like to apply my patch #725839, which makes it possible to nest tables into groups. The patch was basically tested and performs fine on my machine. Even though I'd have to declare it 'beta', so are there any objections for putting it in at the current stage?
Go ahead, otherwise not much people will test it. I thing that cvs is right place for code that is basically tested, but is beta.
-
Garvin Hicking -
Marc Delisle -
Michal Cihar -
Michal Cihar -
Rabus