For bug reports. I currently group bug incidents that occur on the same file in the same line into one bug report since they are most likely the same. I do not however take into account phpma version. should I only group bug incidents from the same file and line if they share a phpma version?. I looked at [0]. I am not sure how they group bug incidents but every report has a single kernel version. I think I should do the same and rely on manual interference by developers to mark the bug reports in different versions as the same.
[0] http://oops.kernel.org/browse-reports/
Hi
Dne Mon, 5 Aug 2013 23:34:09 +0200 Mohamed Ashraf mohamed.ashraf.213@gmail.com napsal(a):
For bug reports. I currently group bug incidents that occur on the same file in the same line into one bug report since they are most likely the same. I do not however take into account phpma version. should I only group bug incidents from the same file and line if they share a phpma version?.
As the source code changes between version, the same location can contain different code in different versions, so splitting by version IMHO makes sense.
On 08/05/2013 10:34 PM, Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
For bug reports. I currently group bug incidents that occur on the same file in the same line into one bug report since they are most likely the same. I do not however take into account phpma version. should I only group bug incidents from the same file and line if they share a phpma version?. I looked at [0]. I am not sure how they group bug incidents but every report has a single kernel version. I think I should do the same and rely on manual interference by developers to mark the bug reports in different versions as the same.
Sounds good to me
-
Michal Čihař -
Mohamed Ashraf -
Rouslan Placella