Re: [Phpmyadmin-devel] [Phpmyadmin-svn] SF.net SVN: phpmyadmin: [10336] tags/RELEASE_2_9_0_2/
Hi
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:29:26 -0700 lem9@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 10336 http://svn.sourceforge.net/phpmyadmin/?rev=10336&view=rev Author: lem9 Date: 2007-04-30 14:29:26 -0700 (Mon, 30 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
unneeded
Removed Paths:
tags/RELEASE_2_9_0_2/
What's reason for deleting tags for old releases? They are useful to find out differences between them.
Michal Čihař schrieb:
Hi
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:29:26 -0700 lem9@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 10336 http://svn.sourceforge.net/phpmyadmin/?rev=10336&view=rev Author: lem9 Date: 2007-04-30 14:29:26 -0700 (Mon, 30 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
unneeded
Removed Paths:
tags/RELEASE_2_9_0_2/What's reason for deleting tags for old releases? They are useful to find out differences between them.
we did it before, and you can still compare using the revision number
On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:27:47 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
Michal Čihař schrieb:
Hi
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:29:26 -0700 lem9@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 10336 http://svn.sourceforge.net/phpmyadmin/?rev=10336&view=rev Author: lem9 Date: 2007-04-30 14:29:26 -0700 (Mon, 30 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
unneeded
Removed Paths:
tags/RELEASE_2_9_0_2/What's reason for deleting tags for old releases? They are useful to find out differences between them.
we did it before, and you can still compare using the revision number
Yes I know, but I don't see reason for deleting those tags.
Michal Čihař a écrit :
On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:27:47 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
Michal Čihař schrieb:
Hi
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:29:26 -0700 lem9@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 10336 http://svn.sourceforge.net/phpmyadmin/?rev=10336&view=rev Author: lem9 Date: 2007-04-30 14:29:26 -0700 (Mon, 30 Apr 2007)
Log Message:
unneeded
Removed Paths:
tags/RELEASE_2_9_0_2/What's reason for deleting tags for old releases? They are useful to find out differences between them.
we did it before, and you can still compare using the revision number
Yes I know, but I don't see reason for deleting those tags.
It was only so that the full checkout takes less space on my system.
Also I think we only need to keep the tag for the last version of each "family" (here I kept 2.9.0.3) but I might be wrong, sorry.
Marc
On Wednesday 2 May 2007 12:54, Marc Delisle wrote:
It was only so that the full checkout takes less space on my system.
Also I think we only need to keep the tag for the last version of each "family" (here I kept 2.9.0.3) but I might be wrong, sorry.
Please don't delete tags. It doesn't save space in the repository, only on a full checkout. But a full checkout is not really needed, it's easy to check out just the parts of a repository you may need.
The tags of older versions are very useful to compare changes between two specific versions. I use it when backporting bugfixes to an older version of phpMyAdmin, namely in the Debian stable release.
Thijs
Hi
On Wed, 2 May 2007 13:40:40 +0200 Thijs Kinkhorst thijs@debian.org wrote:
Please don't delete tags. It doesn't save space in the repository, only on a full checkout. But a full checkout is not really needed, it's easy to check out just the parts of a repository you may need.
The tags of older versions are very useful to compare changes between two specific versions. I use it when backporting bugfixes to an older version of phpMyAdmin, namely in the Debian stable release.
I fully agree with this.
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
On Wed, 2 May 2007 13:40:40 +0200 Thijs Kinkhorst thijs@debian.org wrote:
Please don't delete tags. It doesn't save space in the repository, only on a full checkout. But a full checkout is not really needed, it's easy to check out just the parts of a repository you may need.
The tags of older versions are very useful to compare changes between two specific versions. I use it when backporting bugfixes to an older version of phpMyAdmin, namely in the Debian stable release.
I fully agree with this.
The 3 tags I recently deleted are back.
Thijs Kinkhorst schrieb:
On Wednesday 2 May 2007 12:54, Marc Delisle wrote:
It was only so that the full checkout takes less space on my system.
Also I think we only need to keep the tag for the last version of each "family" (here I kept 2.9.0.3) but I might be wrong, sorry.
Please don't delete tags. It doesn't save space in the repository, only on a full checkout. But a full checkout is not really needed, it's easy to check out just the parts of a repository you may need.
how? if you like to commit a bugfix to serveral branches with only one commit?
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Thijs Kinkhorst schrieb:
On Wednesday 2 May 2007 12:54, Marc Delisle wrote:
It was only so that the full checkout takes less space on my system.
Also I think we only need to keep the tag for the last version of each "family" (here I kept 2.9.0.3) but I might be wrong, sorry.
Please don't delete tags. It doesn't save space in the repository, only on a full checkout. But a full checkout is not really needed, it's easy to check out just the parts of a repository you may need.
how? if you like to commit a bugfix to serveral branches with only one commit?
Michal suggested this and it works:
svn co -N https://phpmyadmin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/phpmyadmin pma cd pma svn up -N trunk cd trunk svn up phpMyAdmin
-
Marc Delisle -
Michal Čihař -
Sebastian Mendel -
Thijs Kinkhorst