I wonder if the "Tracking" db and table menu tab should be replaced by a link, either under Structure or Operations.
I would be tempted to move Designer as a link under Structure but it's been as a menu tab for a while so I don't know.
Maybe a "Files" menu could lead to Export - Import - Backup - Restore (these last two being future items probably in 3.4)? If so, should we start to implement another level of menus?
Hi
Dne Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:34:13 -0500 Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info napsal(a):
I wonder if the "Tracking" db and table menu tab should be replaced by a link, either under Structure or Operations.
I would be tempted to move Designer as a link under Structure but it's been as a menu tab for a while so I don't know.
Maybe a "Files" menu could lead to Export - Import - Backup - Restore (these last two being future items probably in 3.4)? If so, should we start to implement another level of menus?
I'm not sure if it is good idea to make navigation more complex.
What I am currently thinking about is to provide basic operation is the tabs as currently and add tab "Advanced" which would contain less frequently used things.
Something like this (for table):
* Browse * Structure * SQL * Search * Insert * Backup * Import * Advanced * Export * Operations * Empty * Drop
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:34:13 -0500 Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info napsal(a):
I wonder if the "Tracking" db and table menu tab should be replaced by a link, either under Structure or Operations.
I would be tempted to move Designer as a link under Structure but it's been as a menu tab for a while so I don't know.
Maybe a "Files" menu could lead to Export - Import - Backup - Restore (these last two being future items probably in 3.4)? If so, should we start to implement another level of menus?
I'm not sure if it is good idea to make navigation more complex.
What I am currently thinking about is to provide basic operation is the tabs as currently and add tab "Advanced" which would contain less frequently used things.
Something like this (for table):
* Browse * Structure * SQL * Search * Insert * Backup * Import * Advanced * Export * Operations * Empty * Drop
We have a feature request about having a "light" version with less menus. We could implement this with something like $cfg['menu']['db']['operations'] = false;
This could take into account the menu levels.
On 01/22/2010 08:07 PM, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Something like this (for table):
* Browse * Structure * SQL * Search * Insert * Backup * Import * Advanced * Export * Operations * Empty * Drop
I'd expect In/export under backup in this proposal...
We have a feature request about having a "light" version with less menus. We could implement this with something like $cfg['menu']['db']['operations'] = false;
This could take into account the menu levels.
I agree that the number of tabs is growing large, and I would agree that some 'simplification' is in order. How we do this will make a nice Fosdem discussion.
Can anyone help me on my mail function ? I have a problem with this mail function that displays HTML code not a text.
Here is the mail function: function sendMail($To,$Subject,$Message,$Name, $From) { mail($To,$Subject,$Message,$Name,"From: $Name <$From> \nReply-To:<$From> \nContent-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii"); }
AMADOU
www.boghe.org
________________________________ From: Herman van Rink rink@initfour.nl To: phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Mon, January 25, 2010 1:46:47 AM Subject: Re: [Phpmyadmin-devel] menu tabs
On 01/22/2010 08:07 PM, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Something like this (for table):
* Browse * Structure * SQL * Search * Insert * Backup * Import * Advanced * Export * Operations * Empty * Drop
I'd expect In/export under backup in this proposal...
We have a feature request about having a "light" version with less menus. We could implement this with something like $cfg['menu']['db']['operations'] = false;
This could take into account the menu levels.
I agree that the number of tabs is growing large, and I would agree that some 'simplification' is in order. How we do this will make a nice Fosdem discussion.
Amadou Coumba a écrit :
Can anyone help me on my mail function ? I have a problem with this mail function that displays HTML code not a text.
Here is the mail function: function sendMail($To,$Subject,$Message,$Name, $From) { mail($To,$Subject,$Message,$Name,"From: $Name <$From> \nReply-To:<$From> \nContent-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii"); }
Please use a PHP help mailing list: http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php
Hello,
Are there any new information regarding multi-level tabs?
Best Regards, Tomas
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Herman van Rink rink@initfour.nl wrote:
On 01/22/2010 08:07 PM, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Something like this (for table):
* Browse * Structure * SQL * Search * Insert * Backup * Import * Advanced * Export * Operations * Empty * Drop
I'd expect In/export under backup in this proposal...
We have a feature request about having a "light" version with less menus. We could implement this with something like $cfg['menu']['db']['operations'] = false;
This could take into account the menu levels.
I agree that the number of tabs is growing large, and I would agree that some 'simplification' is in order. How we do this will make a nice Fosdem discussion.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Herman van Rink Initfour websolutions
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
Tomas Srnka a écrit :
Hello,
Are there any new information regarding multi-level tabs?
At the team meeting we discussed this a little but I don't believe that a firm decision was made. We should continue to discuss this.
Best Regards, Tomas
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Herman van Rink rink@initfour.nl wrote:
On 01/22/2010 08:07 PM, Marc Delisle wrote:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Something like this (for table):
* Browse * Structure * SQL * Search * Insert * Backup * Import * Advanced * Export * Operations * Empty * Drop
I'd expect In/export under backup in this proposal...
We have a feature request about having a "light" version with less menus. We could implement this with something like $cfg['menu']['db']['operations'] = false;
This could take into account the menu levels.
I agree that the number of tabs is growing large, and I would agree that some 'simplification' is in order. How we do this will make a nice Fosdem discussion.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Herman van Rink Initfour websolutions
Hi
Dne Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:47:58 +0100 Tomas Srnka tomas.srnka@gmail.com napsal(a):
Are there any new information regarding multi-level tabs?
I don't think there is any clear conclusion.
Generally we should rather make the interface simpler than adding another level of tabs, but there is simply too much things we're trying to present right now.
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:47:58 +0100 Tomas Srnka tomas.srnka@gmail.com napsal(a):
Are there any new information regarding multi-level tabs?
I don't think there is any clear conclusion.
Generally we should rather make the interface simpler than adding another level of tabs, but there is simply too much things we're trying to present right now.
I believe that we should target the 3.4 release for this new feature.
There are two aspects here: - accomodate sysadmins who want to remove some tabs - streamline the interface
Hi
Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:39:56 -0500 Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info napsal(a):
I believe that we should target the 3.4 release for this new feature.
Yes, it's defnitely not something for 3.3 branch.
There are two aspects here:
- accomodate sysadmins who want to remove some tabs
Well this thing is quite easy to implement. The big question is how much we want to bloat our configuration options.
- streamline the interface
I think this is the hardest one. Some students already contacted me that they would be interested in GSoC project for improving user interface, but it will definitely not be the easy one and it would need somebody with UI experiences.