Hi all
after a bit investigation I think it's better to use some third party
service for Selenium testing. It would be quite demanding task to get
reasonable set of browsers for testing and there are quite a lot of
services which provide this. Does anybody here have experience with
some of these services?
I've found following services which might fit our needs:
http://www.browserstack.com/https://saucelabs.com/http://testingbot.com/
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Hi,
does someone remember why, in pmahomme's info.inc.php, the source of the
icons is not mentionned, but is in the original submission for this theme?
Uses Silk Icon set: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
Robert Scheck a écrit :
> Hello Marc,
>
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Marc Delisle wrote:
>> Having a look at the current 4.0.x version, flashcanvas.swf is used only
>> when the browser is detected to be Internet Explorer < v9, which does
>> not support HTML 5 Canvas.
>>
>> Note that features other than the Status monitor are using canvas.
>
> I don't have an Internet Explorer, but what does that mean? I can not use
> features other than the status monitor if the IE is too old? And if so, why
> don't the other features use Flash then as well? Just being curious :)
Hi Robert,
these are the only features that are using flashcanvas (on IE < v9):
- Status monitor
- Zoom search
- Display chart
We currently don't plan on adding features that rely on this library but
it's not a promise :)
>
> Anyway, I assume just deleting the *.swf will break things, so how would
> you like to proceed? Would a message be possible, if somebody is using the
> Internet Explorer < v9 and *.swf was removed that the user gets a message
> like "Get a new browser"?
Not a good idea, IMO, because IE 9 is only offered on Windows Vista, 7
and Server 2008, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_explorer#Internet_Explorer_9
>
> How is your future perspective? I already thought about spending time to
> try to get the *.swf compiled from source. But that does not make sense if
> you decide to remove the Flash stuff in say half a year or so. Being at
> that point it would be also good to have some kind of a promise that no new
> additional Flash stuff is getting added - in case you are planning to stay
> with Flash for e.g. the whole phpMyAdmin 4.x lifecycle (thus longer). From
> what I can see, messing with Flash on the built-time level is not that nice
> as one would wish...
>
> So please give me some impressions how things are going to go :)
>
>
> Greetings,
> Robert
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
Hi Madhura,
I want to open a ticket about this editor not working in 4.0.5. In
QA_4_0, when clicking on Edit/Insert, the pane opens but the point is
not displayed on the map.
I am testing on Debian 7 with Firefox (Iceweasel) with the "capitals"
table. When trying with 3.5.0 or QA_3_5, it's better (I see the point),
however
- dragging the point does not change the X/Y coordinates nor the Output area
- ticking Use OpenStreetMaps does not display a map (but the coordinates
change on the right side)
In 3.5.0, should I be expecting the X/Y coordinates (left side) and the
Output area to change?
I also tried Copy; it closes the panel but does not copy the new
coordinates.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info