20 Apr
2004
20 Apr
'04
7:32 a.m.
On 20.04.2004 14:26 +0200, Olivier Mueller wrote:
yes, that's also what I understood :) I even begin to like it, but it took some work until everything was converted and worked (the best were tables with mixed iso-8859 and utf8 data...)
I don't like mixed data and that's why I started this discussion :-)
yep, but isn't iso-8859-1 default for the most of us? :) for example on a vanilly suse 9.0 here:
om@linux:~> locale charmap ISO-8859-1
for 9.1 it is:
$ locale charmap UTF-8
:-) .. anyway for me default was iso-8859-2...
--
Regards
Michal Čihař
http://cihar.com