[Phpmyadmin-devel] roadmap to 4.0.0-beta1
Hi, I feel we are near 4.0.0-beta1 (and the QA_4_0 branch?). Let's have a look at the bug tracker; we should try to identify showstoppers for a beta1 (and raise their priority to 9 ?) Comments? -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Hi Dne Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:10:25 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Hi, I feel we are near 4.0.0-beta1 (and the QA_4_0 branch?).
Let's have a look at the bug tracker; we should try to identify showstoppers for a beta1 (and raise their priority to 9 ?)
I don't see any showstoppers in the bug tracker. Not sure about need for branch right now, do we plan any new development? Maybe starting at rc might be more reasonable in this case. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:10:25 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Hi, I feel we are near 4.0.0-beta1 (and the QA_4_0 branch?).
Let's have a look at the bug tracker; we should try to identify showstoppers for a beta1 (and raise their priority to 9 ?)
I don't see any showstoppers in the bug tracker. Not sure about need for branch right now, do we plan any new development? Maybe starting at rc might be more reasonable in this case.
Agreed for the branch, but everyone should refrain from adding features or do cleanup (which can have an impact, as we have seen lately). -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
2013/2/7 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info>:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:10:25 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Hi, I feel we are near 4.0.0-beta1 (and the QA_4_0 branch?).
Let's have a look at the bug tracker; we should try to identify showstoppers for a beta1 (and raise their priority to 9 ?)
I don't see any showstoppers in the bug tracker. Not sure about need for branch right now, do we plan any new development? Maybe starting at rc might be more reasonable in this case.
Agreed for the branch, but everyone should refrain from adding features or do cleanup (which can have an impact, as we have seen lately).
Agreed! I'll refrain from cleanup at least until QA_4_0 is created. -- Kind regards, Dieter Adriaenssens
Marc Delisle a écrit :
Hi, I feel we are near 4.0.0-beta1 (and the QA_4_0 branch?).
Let's have a look at the bug tracker; we should try to identify showstoppers for a beta1 (and raise their priority to 9 ?)
Comments?
Maybe this is a showstopper: https://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/bugs/3804/ -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Marc Delisle a écrit :
Marc Delisle a écrit :
Hi, I feel we are near 4.0.0-beta1 (and the QA_4_0 branch?).
Let's have a look at the bug tracker; we should try to identify showstoppers for a beta1 (and raise their priority to 9 ?)
Comments?
Maybe this is a showstopper: https://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/bugs/3804/
I would tend to close (wont-fix) #3804, especially after reading the comment [1]. Enabling Edit and Delete when we don't have a unique key on the row has caused the wrong row to be updated or deleted. [1] https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/commit/996232b21aa785a7d4a5123fa4f3... -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Hi Dne Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:46:58 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
I would tend to close (wont-fix) #3804, especially after reading the comment [1]. Enabling Edit and Delete when we don't have a unique key on the row has caused the wrong row to be updated or deleted.
Maybe just show error message, that tables without unique column are not supported for editing? (Something in sense of strAlertNonUnique). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
2013/2/8 Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com>:
Hi
Dne Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:46:58 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
I would tend to close (wont-fix) #3804, especially after reading the comment [1]. Enabling Edit and Delete when we don't have a unique key on the row has caused the wrong row to be updated or deleted.
Maybe just show error message, that tables without unique column are not supported for editing? (Something in sense of strAlertNonUnique).
Sounds good. -- Kind regards, Dieter Adriaenssens
Dieter Adriaenssens a écrit :
2013/2/8 Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com>:
Hi
Dne Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:46:58 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
I would tend to close (wont-fix) #3804, especially after reading the comment [1]. Enabling Edit and Delete when we don't have a unique key on the row has caused the wrong row to be updated or deleted. Maybe just show error message, that tables without unique column are not supported for editing? (Something in sense of strAlertNonUnique).
Sounds good.
See [0]. I felt that the content of strAlertNonUnique was not exactly what we need in this case. P.S. if someone agrees and merges, I'll update the po files. [0] https://github.com/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin/pull/154 -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Hi Dne Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:54:02 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
See [0]. I felt that the content of strAlertNonUnique was not exactly what we need in this case.
P.S. if someone agrees and merges, I'll update the po files.
I've done both. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:54:02 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
See [0]. I felt that the content of strAlertNonUnique was not exactly what we need in this case.
P.S. if someone agrees and merges, I'll update the po files.
I've done both.
Any objection to -beta1 this weekend? -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Hi Dne Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:37:25 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Any objection to -beta1 this weekend?
Fine for me. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
2013/2/8 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info>:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:54:02 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
See [0]. I felt that the content of strAlertNonUnique was not exactly what we need in this case.
P.S. if someone agrees and merges, I'll update the po files.
I've done both.
Any objection to -beta1 this weekend?
No objection. -- Kind regards, Dieter Adriaenssens
On Feb 8, 2013 7:23 PM, "Dieter Adriaenssens" <dieter.adriaenssens@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/2/8 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info>:
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Dne Fri, 08 Feb 2013 07:54:02 -0500 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
See [0]. I felt that the content of strAlertNonUnique was not exactly what we need in this case.
P.S. if someone agrees and merges, I'll update the po files.
I've done both.
Any objection to -beta1 this weekend?
No objection.
-- Kind regards,
Dieter Adriaenssens
Fine by me too. -- Madhura
participants (4)
-
Dieter Adriaenssens -
Madhura Jayaratne -
Marc Delisle -
Michal Čihař