Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
Marc
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
yes, i metnioned this too, i thought it was a bug on my system,
but it used to be working, do not know what it breaks
it displayed the footnote as hint/notice (bubble help)
Sebastian Mendel schrieb:
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
yes, i metnioned this too, i thought it was a bug on my system,
mentioned = noticed !
Sebastian Mendel schrieb:
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
yes, i metnioned this too, i thought it was a bug on my system,
but it used to be working, do not know what it breaks
seems someone changed name="footnote_#" to id="footnote_sup_#"
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Sebastian Mendel schrieb:
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
yes, i metnioned this too, i thought it was a bug on my system,
but it used to be working, do not know what it breaks
seems someone changed name="footnote_#" to id="footnote_sup_#"
It must be me :) there were duplicates that generated XHTML warnings, I think...
Sebastian Mendel schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel schrieb:
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
yes, i metnioned this too, i thought it was a bug on my system,
but it used to be working, do not know what it breaks
seems someone changed name="footnote_#" to id="footnote_sup_#"
hey, it was you ... ;-)
on commit #11291
what is wrong with name="" for XHTML?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:16:36 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
hey, it was you ... ;-)
on commit #11291
what is wrong with name="" for XHTML?
name has to be unique in document?
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Sebastian Mendel schrieb:
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Marc Delisle schrieb:
Hi,
this is referred to in common.lib.php but I cannot find its definition.
this is not defined, it is used to add hover event
js/tooltip.js #35
Thanks, and what is it supposed to do? I see an empty yellow rectangle when I hover a number in the Engines tab.
yes, i metnioned this too, i thought it was a bug on my system,
but it used to be working, do not know what it breaks
seems someone changed name="footnote_#" to id="footnote_sup_#"
It must be me :) there were duplicates that generated XHTML warnings, I think...
but IMHO duplicate names="" is valid in XHTML
Michal Čihař schrieb:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:16:36 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
hey, it was you ... ;-)
on commit #11291
what is wrong with name="" for XHTML?
name has to be unique in document?
no, ID has to be unique, IMHO
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:20:43 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
no, ID has to be unique, IMHO
Ah okay: "Note that in XHTML 1.0, the name attribute of these elements is formally deprecated, and will be removed in a subsequent version of XHTML.". See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.10
Sebastian Mendel a écrit :
Michal Čihař schrieb:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:16:36 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
hey, it was you ... ;-)
on commit #11291
what is wrong with name="" for XHTML?
name has to be unique in document?
no, ID has to be unique, IMHO
I'll revert and see what happens. I think "HTML validator" complained. I don't have time right now, have some taxiing to do :) ahhh kids :)
Michal Čihař schrieb:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:20:43 +0200 Sebastian Mendel lists@sebastianmendel.de wrote:
no, ID has to be unique, IMHO
Ah okay: "Note that in XHTML 1.0, the name attribute of these elements is formally deprecated, and will be removed in a subsequent version of XHTML.". See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.10
doesn't makes sense to me ... any way
the JS could take the number from innerHtml or cut it out from the id "footnote_sub_#"
to get the id for footnote_#
but the reason is used name="" was this sup could appear more than once on a page, all sharing the same name - makes sense to me - cause it is the same element, just placed more than once in the document
-
Marc Delisle -
Michal Čihař -
Sebastian Mendel