Hi,
https://wiki.cihar.com/pma/Devel:phpMyAdmin_3
make "js enabled" mandatory (and drop all <noscript>...). --windkiel 17:03, 4 January 2008 (CET)
any objections, comments?
Hi!
make "js enabled" mandatory (and drop all <noscript>...). --windkiel 17:03, 4 January 2008 (CET)
I'm not in favor of that. PMA is still often used in commercial or education or government centres, where Javascript is strictly forbidden.
IMHO for most tasks, the noscript-variants or current coding are perfectly sufficient. Even if Ajax-Things are added in the future (in-row editing), a fallback non-js version would IMHO still be useful for a tool like phpmyadmin.
Regards, Garvin
Garvin Hicking a écrit :
Hi!
make "js enabled" mandatory (and drop all <noscript>...). --windkiel 17:03, 4 January 2008 (CET)
I'm not in favor of that. PMA is still often used in commercial or education or government centres, where Javascript is strictly forbidden.
IMHO for most tasks, the noscript-variants or current coding are perfectly sufficient. Even if Ajax-Things are added in the future (in-row editing), a fallback non-js version would IMHO still be useful for a tool like phpmyadmin.
Regards, Garvin
I concur with Garvin's analysis.
Marc
Hi Garvin & list,
Garvin Hicking schrieb:
Even if Ajax-Things are added in the future (in-row editing), a fallback non-js version would IMHO still be useful for a tool like phpmyadmin.
I absolutely agree with that.
Regards,
Alexander
Hi
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:09:19 +0100 (CET) "Garvin Hicking" phpmyadmin@supergarv.de wrote:
I'm not in favor of that. PMA is still often used in commercial or education or government centres, where Javascript is strictly forbidden.
IMHO for most tasks, the noscript-variants or current coding are perfectly sufficient. Even if Ajax-Things are added in the future (in-row editing), a fallback non-js version would IMHO still be useful for a tool like phpmyadmin.
I also agree here ;-).