Hi, today someone sent me a remark that phpMyAdmin does not follow the SQL and relational terminology when calling a column "field" and a row "record". I agree with him (in fact, this has annoyed me for some time) and here is what I intend to do:
- for the 3.4 series I'll change all messages accordingly
- for the 3.3 series I think we should leave the old terminology in place to avoid confusion, as 3.3.x is out since months and people referring to it in documentation, magazines, books, etc are using the old terminology
Hi
Dne Mon, 31 May 2010 12:11:16 -0400 Marc Delisle marc@infomarc.info napsal(a):
today someone sent me a remark that phpMyAdmin does not follow the SQL and relational terminology when calling a column "field" and a row "record". I agree with him (in fact, this has annoyed me for some time) and here is what I intend to do:
for the 3.4 series I'll change all messages accordingly
for the 3.3 series I think we should leave the old terminology in
place to avoid confusion, as 3.3.x is out since months and people referring to it in documentation, magazines, books, etc are using the old terminology
Looks okay for me. Changes in translatable strings for 3.3 are not a good idea.
-
Marc Delisle -
Michal Čihař