28 Jul
2013
28 Jul
'13
12:16 a.m.
Hi,
since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to
port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string
functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of
these functions.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
28 Jul
28 Jul
4:22 p.m.
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:16:33 -0400
From: marc(a)infomarc.info
To: phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi,
since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to
port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string
functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of
these functions.
Who's assigned? :)
- JM
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.cl…
_______________________________________________
Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list
Phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
4:48 p.m.
Le 2013-07-28 09:22, J. M. a écrit :
Sorry, I was not clear enough. My "guess" was intended as a
clarification question, to see whether I understood the goal of this
pull request.
--
Marc Delisle
http://infomarc.info
Date: Sat, 27
Jul 2013 17:16:33 -0400
From: marc(a)infomarc.info
To: phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi,
since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to
port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string
functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of
these functions.
Who's assigned? :) 
29 Jul
29 Jul
7:13 a.m.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info> wrote:
Le 2013-07-28 09:22, J. M. a écrit :
Sorry, I was not clear enough. My "guess" was intended as a
clarification question, to see whether I understood the goal of this
pull request.
Marc,
The pull request was intended at introducing a better class structure for
the string handling classes and to make the functions accessible via single
$GLOBALS['PMA_String'] object, compared to $GLOBALS['PMA_String'],
$GLOBALS['PMA_StringType'] variables and PMA_STR_ prefixed functions, which
was the case earlier.
Indeed, by porting remaining places to use $GLOBALS['PMA_String'] we can
benefit from the advantages you mentioned.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Madhura Jayaratne
Date:
Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:16:33 -0400
From: marc(a)infomarc.info
To: phpmyadmin-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi,
since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to
port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string
functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of
these functions.
Who's assigned? :)
4067
days inactive
4069
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
J. M. -
Madhura Jayaratne -
Marc Delisle