[Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi, since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string functions, to the new syntax? This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of these functions. -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:16:33 -0400 From: marc@infomarc.info To: phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi, since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of these functions.
Who's assigned? :) - JM
-- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Phpmyadmin-devel mailing list Phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpmyadmin-devel
Le 2013-07-28 09:22, J. M. a écrit :
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:16:33 -0400 From: marc@infomarc.info To: phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi, since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of these functions.
Who's assigned? :)
Sorry, I was not clear enough. My "guess" was intended as a clarification question, to see whether I understood the goal of this pull request. -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> wrote:
Le 2013-07-28 09:22, J. M. a écrit :
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:16:33 -0400 From: marc@infomarc.info To: phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] about $GLOBALS['PMA_String']
Hi, since the merging of pull request 543, I guess that we should try to port all remaining places that use the native corresponding string functions, to the new syntax?
This way we can benefit, for example, from the multibyte version of these functions.
Who's assigned? :)
Sorry, I was not clear enough. My "guess" was intended as a clarification question, to see whether I understood the goal of this pull request.
Marc,
The pull request was intended at introducing a better class structure for the string handling classes and to make the functions accessible via single $GLOBALS['PMA_String'] object, compared to $GLOBALS['PMA_String'], $GLOBALS['PMA_StringType'] variables and PMA_STR_ prefixed functions, which was the case earlier. Indeed, by porting remaining places to use $GLOBALS['PMA_String'] we can benefit from the advantages you mentioned. -- Thanks and Regards, Madhura Jayaratne
participants (3)
-
J. M. -
Madhura Jayaratne -
Marc Delisle