Michal Čihař a écrit :

Hi

On Monday 27 June 2005 20:42, Marc Delisle wrote:

...

Looking at the recent ChangeLog, IMO most of those changes belong to 2.6.4. We are at 2.6.3-rc1 and only bugfix should go for 2.6.3.

Well, most of minewere just trivial moving several lines or adding comments, they can't break anything. Anyway I can promise I won't commit anything in near future :-).

...

Here is my proposition: I would open the QA_2_6_3 branch, based on RELEASE_2_6_3RC1, then backport to this branch the bug fixes than went into HEAD. Aiming for a final 2.6.3 on July 3rd.

Opinions?

Okay to me, but I don't feel need to base it on RELEASE_2_6_3RC1.

Hi Michal and list,

Here are some reasons why I do feel to base it on RC1:

- a new message was added, a bit late in the dev cycle. Now we would have to manage many translation updates

- the ForeignKeyMaxLimit stuff breaks for people with an old configuration file

- the ForeignKeyDropdownOrder and ForeignKeyMaxLimit do not appear in Documentation.html

Marc

Michal Čihař a écrit :

Hi

On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:56, Marc Delisle wrote:

...

Here are some reasons why I do feel to base it on RC1:

• a new message was added, a bit late in the dev cycle. Now we would have

to manage many translation updates

Well it's only in help for transformation stuff, that most people even don't know :-).

...

• the ForeignKeyMaxLimit stuff breaks for people with an old configuration

file

• the ForeignKeyDropdownOrder and ForeignKeyMaxLimit do not appear in

Documentation.html

Okay, I didn't know about those. So that might be a reason.

Any opinion from other developpers?

Marc