Developers June 2002

developers@phpmyadmin.net

18 participants
58 discussions

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Tab Design
by Rabus 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Hi list, I just got the latest CVS files... If you use the German language file for example, the tab design looks really bad under IE6... If you view the same page with Opera, everything is OK. Could someone check this? Alexander

3 8

Re(2): [Phpmyadmin-devel] Is relation stuff working in 2.3.0-rc1?
by Jay Davis 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Okay, I got the new relation stuff to work. (After going back over documentation.html more carefully...) Thanks for the help on that. I like the new way of assigning relations. It is much easier than doing it by typing in the values--and thus solves part of my issue with the field names since I don't have to go into the table to add the relationships. Nice work. Regards, Jay Davis Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read. On Wed, Jun 26, 2002, Beck, Mike <mike.beck(a)ibmiller.de> wrote: >> Hello: >> >> I'm having trouble getting the relation stuff to work in >> 2.3.0-rc1. I've >> changed the structure of my table (new fields, field names, >> etc.) but the >> links that used to work in 2.2.6--where I can click on a value and it >> opens a window with the related value--don't work anymore. > >hmm, this should work, if you have the data in your relationtables. do i >understand you correctly, that you had that feature from the dev versions, >and now changed to a central PMA DB as i wrote in the docu? the pma db and >all are written in the configfile? (you are using a new configfile? there >used to be bookmarkdb which i changed to pmadb) > >> >> Also, when I click on the new 'Relation View' link, I get a >> list of the >> fields in the table but all of the popup boxes are empty. > > >hmm, strange, that should work without the acutal relationstuff, it should >just find the primary keys for all tables in this db. you sure you have >sufficient rights? please check the produced sourcecode. ist there no option >done there? > > >-- >Regards > > >Mike Beck >mikebeck(a)users.sourceforge.net

1 0

AW: [Phpmyadmin-devel] On relation table field names
by Beck, Mike 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

> So it's not easy to have only one way to describe various > cases, but I think that > > the field names in our relation table are clear enough. > well in any case, i made the tbl_relation.php3 after we changed the names the last time in the hope that people would be able to stop wondering about which column means what. But this doesn't work for him as well, so i hope that when we are able to help him use that he can ignore the column names we choose as well ;-) -- Mike Beck mikebeck(a)users.sourceforge.net

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] what was the prob with php 4.2.1
by Beck, Mike 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

i remember that last week somebody sent an url to this list explaining why there is a problem with 4.2.1, but i can't find that email in the archive (not knowing what the subject was) ... could somebody please send that url to me? -- thanks Mike Beck mikebeck(a)users.sourceforge.net

4 5

Re(2): [Phpmyadmin-devel] On relation table field names
by Beck, Mike 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

> As it is now, the relation table is very confusing. I see > your point, but > it is more important to use standard DBMS terminology. We > want other DBA > professionals to look at this and immediately understand it. > well maybe i am not DBA Pro enough for that, but i always prefer to think of what data i have where and not how i would call that column if my MySQL Version allready had foreign keys ;-) -- Mike Beck mikebeck(a)users.sourceforge.net

1 0

AW: [Phpmyadmin-devel] On relation table field names
by Beck, Mike 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

> PRIMARY KEY (`foreign_db`,`foreign_table`,`foreign_field`) > > This makes much more sense. (The same foreign key can be in > many tables, > but it must always refer to the same primary key.) > hmm i don't think so, in your example clearly the order is the master table and the articles are in a detail/slave whatever you might call it table. of course the column in the mastertable that links to the details table is called foreign key, but because it links _to_ a foreign table, so articles is this foreign table that it links to. -- Regards Mike Beck mikebeck(a)users.sourceforge.net

2 1

AW: [Phpmyadmin-devel] 2.3.0 drop empty table
by Beck, Mike 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

> Hello: > > Dropping an empty table doesn't seem to work in 2.3.0-rc1. > > (I've only tried this on one table...) > hmm, i allready have a cvs version of rc2, but it works for me, so once again, i have to ask you to check your permissions. (btw: how is your relationstuff now? any help with the mail i sent you?) -- Regards Mike Beck mikebeck(a)users.sourceforge.net

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Is relation stuff working in 2.3.0-rc1?
by Jay Davis 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Hello: I'm having trouble getting the relation stuff to work in 2.3.0-rc1. I've changed the structure of my table (new fields, field names, etc.) but the links that used to work in 2.2.6--where I can click on a value and it opens a window with the related value--don't work anymore. Also, when I click on the new 'Relation View' link, I get a list of the fields in the table but all of the popup boxes are empty. Is anyone else having this problem or do I have an configuration problem or what? Thanks, Jay Davis "This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything important, you're insane." --disclaimer for a web 'survey'

2 1

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Bug #573212
by Robin Johnson 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Hi list Tracing this bug, and looking at the source, in several places, people writing a feature have each created their own SQL parser to get the data out that they wanted. This has lead to problems because not all of these parsers have been robust. This bug is one of problematic parser bits, and there have been a few in the past that have been fixed. I have a large suggestion to make, for the 2.3.1 release. definetly not 2.3.0. My parser system is very robust, and will take any query that you can throw at it without doing any of this. My parser is also modular enough that after I have the parsed query stored, I can extra parts of it and do a lot of things with it easily. It would be fairly trivial to make something to properly extract the table names from the parsed data as such. (I'll write the function for it tonight). Once we put the new parser in place, could we see about cleaning up all of the other little buggy parsers throughout the source? This will also have the advantage of making the main code faster, and the SQL statement will only be parsed once, and the data is fast and easy to extract from the parsed statement. The parser is up at: http://games.techbc.ca/~robbat2/sqlparse.php You can now enter your own query directly on the form to try out. I'm working towards a second version of the parser, written from the ground up now, to redo some of my hacks in the first version properly. For my parsed query the final format will be like this: $sqlParsed = array ( 'query_count' => (number of seperate queries in statement) 1 => (first query) 2 => (second query) ... ) the format for each query is: array ( 'original' => (untouched query) 'token_count' => (number of tokens) 0 => first token 1 => second token ... ) -- Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : robbat2(a)orbis-terrarum.net Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2 ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639

2 1

[Phpmyadmin-devel] parse error in common.lib ?
by Marc Delisle 25 Jun '02

25 Jun '02

Hi, is it possible that this gives a syntax error (maybe in PHP3?) if (!@include('./config.inc.php3')) { Marc

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Developers June 2002