[Phpmyadmin-devel] Green light for 4.0.0 ?

Hi, even if [0] looks curious (and I can reproduce the problem with the sample table), I believe it's an isolated case. Browsing a table is so frequently done that we would have got more error reports. So I see no show-stopper for 4.0.0. Comments? [0] https://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/bugs/3902/ -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info

Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 14:42:31 -0400 From: marc@infomarc.info To: phpmyadmin-devel@lists.sf.net Subject: [Phpmyadmin-devel] Green light for 4.0.0 ?
Hi,
even if [0] looks curious (and I can reproduce the problem with the sample table), I believe it's an isolated case. Browsing a table is so frequently done that we would have got more error reports.
So I see no show-stopper for 4.0.0. Comments?
[0] https://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/bugs/3902/
-- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
No objections to release 4.0.0. I've only ever seen this issue in that very table. (Can anybody (best Chanaka) take a look to fix that bug for 4.0.1?) Idea: Should we start giving our releases codenames, like WordPress and jQuery do? We could honor people that shine in the past of PHP, MySQL and/or our project. J.M.

even if [0] looks curious (and I can reproduce the problem with the sample table), I believe it's an isolated case. Browsing a table is so frequently done that we would have got more error reports.
So I see no show-stopper for 4.0.0. Comments?
[0] https://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/bugs/3902/
-- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info
No objections to release 4.0.0.
I've only ever seen this issue in that very table. (Can anybody (best Chanaka) take a look to fix that bug for 4.0.1?)
Hi, Sorry for my less attention here. I'll address this soon.
Idea: Should we start giving our releases codenames, like WordPress and jQuery do? We could honor people that shine in the past of PHP, MySQL and/or our project.
-- Chanaka Dharmarathna *Virtusa (Pvt) Ltd. | **Sri Lanka*

Hi Dne Thu, 02 May 2013 14:42:31 -0400 Marc Delisle <marc@infomarc.info> napsal(a):
Hi,
even if [0] looks curious (and I can reproduce the problem with the sample table), I believe it's an isolated case. Browsing a table is so frequently done that we would have got more error reports.
So I see no show-stopper for 4.0.0. Comments?
I think it's okay to release it. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
participants (4)
-
Chanaka Dharmarathna
-
J. M.
-
Marc Delisle
-
Michal Čihař