On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Marc Delisle &lt;marc(a)infomarc.info <mailto:marc@infomarc.info>> wrote: Chanaka Dharmarathna a écrit : to think needful. and data Hi Chanaka, you probably meant checkboxes instead of radio buttons, so that a user can choose a combination of export sections. I think that these should be placed under "object creation options" and "data creation options". Note that you'll need more checkboxes than you mention, because, to implement this request, a user would want to disable the normal definition statements likre CREATE TABLE, ALTER TABLE, etc. Hi Marc, I include my suggestions to the custom export form UI [0] using fire bug. I added two elements to the custom export form. 1. The radio button 'only view/trigger/SP' to the 'Format-specific options' 2. The check box 'Add CREATE VIEW statement to the 'Object creation options' We'll look at how this is going to work. Item 2 will provide an option to the user, whether to include the view for his export. Basically this will decouple views and tables. This will make as a different feature request. After item 2 is implemented, user can do export with/without view/sp/trigger. But always export will include at least database structure. So item 1 will provide an option to not to include database structure to the export. With this option we can hide some options like '|CREATE TABLE| options' in 'Object creation options' section which we don't need. What do you think on this ? [0] : http://i.imgur.com/Ri7m4O5.png

practically the current (views/triggers/SPs) to that a user options" and than you options' creation options' This will structure. structure to don't need. Hi Chanaka, In our current form, we have clear choices: structure, data, structure and data (could be improved with just two checkboxes, one for structure and one for data, but this is another subject). What I find confusing is that you are adding near these choices, another choice which is (I think) a subset of the structure. I would classify a trigger as being part of the structure (it's more related to structure that to data, right?) Hi Marc, Yes I agree to your point. In that case, the only problem we have is, there is no way to ignore table structure of the database, if we chose 'structure' or 'structure and data'. For that we should have an option like 'Ignore table structure' under 'Object creation options'. What do you think ?

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Marc Delisle &lt;marc(a)infomarc.info&gt; wrote: Then shall we simply add 'Add CREATE TABLE statement' option to the Object creation options, which is checked by default ? I think this would be the simplest solution with our custom form.