I think this feature is implemented for import database facility in PMA
version 5.0 dev. While it is not for other facilities like truncate ,
delete etc.
Is it ok if I do not include the implementation of this feature for import
database facility in my proposal as it is already present in next version,
or should I include it ?
Hello Mentors,
I have submitted the proposal for GSoC on the melange website. Kindly
review and give your suggestions for its improvement.
Thank you.
--
With best regards,
Kushagra
Hello,
I have submitted my draft proposal in the melange site. I hope, I have
submitted all the information regarding the project in the proposal. Please
comment if anything is needed so that I can make necessary changes and
resubmit it.
Thank you
--
Harish
Hello! I'm Shitiz Garg from Amity University, India and I was interested in
the proposal about the Multi Query generator. I've used phpMyAdmin as an
end user in the past so I'm quite familiar with it, I've also completed
GSoC last year as well as GCI in 2011 so I am experienced with the
challenge. Unfortunately I'm late this year but still have a couple days I
believe, are there any pointers on how should I proceed? College has me at
my toes at this time so I'm trying to do as much as I can.
Hello developers,
I had already submitted my first proposal draft. Whenever there is
time,please go through that and comment on melange's site, so that i could
improve upon it,if needed.
Thank you all
Hi phpMyAdmin,
I just wanted to introduce myself formally. My name is Pranav Sharma. I am
a Computer Science student from Thapar University and wanted to take part
in this years GSoC with phpMyAdmin. I think you are familiar with me since
I have been contributing to phpMyAdmin off late. I have also submitted a
rough draft of my proposal on the google melange site. I was hoping I could
get some guiding remarks there.
Regarding the Voice Commands: -
I have been following all the mails, and do agree with Marc and Isaac, that
phpMyAdmin might not benefit much from voice commands. But I also feel that
integrating voice commands today, might pave the way for features
unforeseen today. I feel that voice commands is like taking the moon shot.
It can be 'innovative' for phpMyAdmin. I am not sure if such a version
exists, but maybe phpMyAdmin could have an experimental branch; where all
these innovative things are being tried and tested, and the best ones can
make it to the final version. I am only thinking out loud.
Regarding feature request
http://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/feature-requests/701/ (Print View CSS)
1) Do you mean that getting the html flashed from the query executed,
should be picked up from the page and displayed in the Print View? I am
having trouble interpreting Chris Livelys suggestion for the solution.
Regarding feature request
http://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/feature-requests/501/ (Support SSL
Grant)
1) Is this still for GSoC? I believe it has already been implemented
Regarding Feature Request
http://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/feature-requests/1060/ (Designed should
remember settings)
1) It says that designer should remember snap to grid and angular links. I
cannot understand this, what is its utility. I have played around with it
in the designer and it hasnt done anything. Could i be provided with a use
case? Do you mean that when i click these two button and they get
highlighted, and i close the window. When i reopen the window, they should
still be highlighted?
Regarding Feature Request (Export Progress Bar)
1) I made appropriate changes so that it wouldnt make any errors regarding
unexpected end of input. This was basically happening because i wasnt
returning json data but plain text. However there still persists an issue.
It is a browser issue and that of Firefox. It seems firefox is unable to
handle repeatedly polled requests; when the request to the progress script
is made, it is immediately left dangling, and replaced by the export
request. I feel that this is some deep browser issue. I have tried a lot of
googling but in vain. However the solution works beautifully on Chrome. Is
it possible that a ticket can be opened regarding this issue on firefox.
The solution is only failing in firefox, I feel that this solution shouldnt
be abandoned just like this. The help of experienced programmers could help
salvage/improve the solution for firefox. If you allow, I can make another
pull request with the updated solution.
Lastly, if i can please get some guiding remarks for my proposal, It would
really be helpful.
Thank you phpMyAdmin, you have been very helpful. :)
Pranav Sharma