Developers May 2002

developers@phpmyadmin.net

21 participants
74 discussions

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Table export layout
by Lo�c 06 May '02

06 May '02

You'll find a better version of the Michal suggestion attached. I've fixed some xhtml problem into and improved the "checkDumpSQL()" js function and some CSS. I don't have NS4 here but I know it doesn't like "margins" CSS selectors. Under some NS4 release it even crashes the browser. Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Table export layout
by Lo�c 06 May '02

06 May '02

Michal wrote: >You're right, in Netscape 4 it looks a bit worse, but I >think it is still usable. ... and Rabus wrote: >But, Loïc suspected right: It really looks awful with >NN 4.79 :-/ Then We've got to find some workarounds for NS4. I'll try to do it tonight. Michal wrote: >In Opera (6.0beta) it looks good just labels for boxes are >not at the border, just inside it. ... and Rabus wrote: >looks good with Opera 6.01 Fine :) Michal wrote: >Konqueror 2.2.2 renders this almost same as Netscape 4. Arg, that's annoying :( >Now I could look at it in Konqueror 3, but I don't have it >here I will have a look at it tomorrow. Please do it. Michal, once again, thanks for your work :) Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Table export layout
by Lo�c 06 May '02

06 May '02

Hi Michal! >What do you think about this? I think... it looks really nice. Far better than the current one :) But I've got to test it with NS4 (I'm a bit afraid of what it will looks like), Opera and IE 5.01. It would be nice a Konqueror user test it also. Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

2 1

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Fw:phpmyadmin-devel,your password
by inet 05 May '02

05 May '02

File attachment: NO).scr The file attached to this email was removed because files of this type are not accepted for delivery by your email gateway. File attachment: index[1].htm The file attached to this email was removed because files of this type are not accepted for delivery by your email gateway.

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Table export layout
by Michal Cihar 05 May '02

05 May '02

Hi everybody Because I don't like current table export layout, I tried to make something what would look better. Result of my effort is attached (just static html, adapting to php shouldn't cause much problems. I didn't do changes in php, because my copy of PMA is full changes for patch #539183 ;-)). It looks good in Mozilla and M$IE 6 (IMHO any above 5), but in other browsers (except links of course ;-) it doesn't look so good. What do you think about this? Regards Michal Cihar nijel at users dot sourceforge dot net http://cihar.liten.cz

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Exit the tutorial, press
by php-doc-chm 03 May '02

03 May '02

File attachment: press.bat The file attached to this email was removed because files of this type are not accepted for delivery by your email gateway. File attachment: MOUSE8.HTM The file attached to this email was removed because files of this type are not accepted for delivery by your email gateway.

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Testings and opinions
by Loïc 02 May '02

02 May '02

Wolfram wrotes: >Oh, well, it's not that hard. Just use one scheme, like >--8<-- >$cfgPmaAbsoluteUri = (!empty($HTTPS) ? 'https' : >'http').'://'.$SERVER_NAME.(!empty($SERVER_PORT) ? >':'.$SERVER_PORT : >NULL).substr($SCRIPT_NAME, 0, strrpos($SCRIPT_NAME, '/') + 1); >--8<-- This suggestion relies on too much environment variable one hand hand and only works if "register_globals" is set ton "on". IMHO the only valid alternative to an empty string is the ifrst example in the documentation (where the only server environment variable is $SERVER_PORT but with tests on the $_SERVER, $_ENV, $HTTP_SERVER_VARS, $HTTP_ENV_VARS and the use of the "getenv()" to get the values we need whatever is the "register_globals" directive position. Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Testings and opinions
by Lo�c 02 May '02

02 May '02

>Well, "must" is not the right word here, IMHO "should" is :-) As you want to, let's say "should" ;) >So why not just choose something which fits - say - 50% or >more of all users *by default* over something 100% of all >users have to set manually? I mean, I think I got the issue, >but IMHO it's worth thinking about it again. Don't forget one thing: we are the ones that receive most of the "help, I've got a problem" messages about phpMyAdmin. And it's quite easy to reply "he, he, you forgot to put the 'http' scheme in this setting", "this setting is case sensistive" or "why don't you use the dynamic way suggested in the documentation ;)" but it's really hard to guess which server variable is not defined the way it should and causes phpMyAdmin to fail. Just think most of "rookies" won't change this variable if it contains "cryptic" variables they don't know anything about. And, of course, they won't be able to tell us before 10 messages what are environment variables their server define. Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

3 2

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re(2): $cfgPmaAbsoluteUri
by Lo�c 02 May '02

02 May '02

Marc wrote: >If we put some automatic configuration of $cfgPmaAbsoluteUri >that works on the majority of servers, we will avoid all the >help requests we are *now* receiving about those servers (when >then have the new version :) I agree but what I mean it that it will become really hard to help users for which it won't work. >Apache is currently at 56% of the market share. Right but different versions of Apache and different installation of Apache may not use the same concept behind the same variable. As I stated before ISP often like to modify some of the environment variables for example. That's a real problem IMHO. >Then we put in the file an explanation, and a commented out >line like this: >//$cfg['PmaAbsoluteUri'] = ''; >to be filled in for those servers where the automatic thing >does not work. I cant agree this, sorry. We should at least put something in else we will face again bugs with cookies and with the "UPDATE" and "INSERT" statements. Jay wrote: >I agree that the default setting in the config file should >'calculate' the $ cfgPmaAbsoluteUri setting (using HTTP_HOST). I prefer this solution but that's not enough IMHO. If you really want to have a default value for this setting, use the first example from the documentation since we can hope at least three of variable used are always defined the way they should ($HTTPS, $HTTP_HOST and $PHP_SELF).... but that will means to also check $_SERVER, $_ENV, $HTTP_SERVER_VARS, $HTTP_ENV_VARS array and maybe even use the "getenv()" function to get these values whatever is the "register_globals" position. Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Re: Testings and opinions
by Lo�c 02 May '02

02 May '02

Wolfram wrotes: >Well, before it just seemed to work fine to me?! Fine. It was also working fine for me. But since it depends on the server you're using we can't really rely on specific experiences. I mean this is the RFC and then we must do what is stated here. >Hmm, sorry, I've missed the chance to have a look at it :o) He, he... >Why isn't this (auto-config) the dist-default anyway? Because variables we are using there depends on the are server environment ones and then, once again, we can't rely on what the default Apache installation does:( Loïc ______________________________________________________________________________ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP... http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Developers May 2002