- Developers - lists.phpmyadmin.net

Re: [Phpmyadmin-devel] [ phpmyadmin-Patches-3055886 ] (ok 3.4) Left frame table filter visibility config option
by Herman van Rink 01 Dec '10

01 Dec '10

On 30-11-10 15:24, SourceForge.net wrote: > Patches item #3055886, was opened at 2010-08-30 10:21 > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kai-schaetzl > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377410&aid=3055886&group_… > I think we could make this last suggestion happen, it makes sense. What would be a sensible default ... 20? And would it not be confusing for users? -- Met vriendelijke groet / Regards, Herman van Rink Initfour websolutions

3 2

[Phpmyadmin-devel] phpMyAdmin 3.4.0-alpha2 is released
by Marc Delisle 30 Nov '10

30 Nov '10

Welcome to the second alpha release of phpMyAdmin 3.4.0. This release contains new features, especially: * User preferences * Relation schema export to multiple formats * ENUM/SET editor * Simplified interface for export/import * AJAXification of some parts * Charts * Visual query builder Details will appear on http://phpmyadmin.net. In a hurry? you can visit http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpmyadmin to download. Marc Delisle, for the team

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] need help understanding what happened with a merge
by Dieter Adriaenssens 30 Nov '10

30 Nov '10

Hi all, I was looking to solve a bug [0], and found some differences between master and QA_3_3 (where QA_3_3 seemed correct). I wondered why it was changed and found that the change was introduced by a merge I did [1] : commit 20a402ba29776f2ed1ba3122e48df98bfc11cafe But what's strange about this commit is that it seems to merge two commits. One of mine, where I solved a bug (diff1 [2]) and another one (diff2 [3]), where the reported bug [0] is introduced. When I try to figure out where this commit comes from, I only find it was committed by me. But I'm quite sure I didn't. Moreover because that commit changes a lot of files, and I changed only ChangeLog and server_status.php So I'm a bit confused now : Where did this commit come from? Who did it? Why did it end up in my merge (according to git), but it doesn't show up in the original report I got by mail when committing this merge? And more important : should it be reversed? I would be grateful if anyone could explain what happened back then. [0] : https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3119874&group_id=23067&ati… [1] : http://phpmyadmin.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=phpmyadmin/phpmyadmi… [2] : http://phpmyadmin.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=phpmyadmin/phpmyadmi… [3] : http://phpmyadmin.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=phpmyadmin/phpmyadmi… -- Greets, Dieter Adriaenssens

3 3

[Phpmyadmin-devel] about 3.4.0-alpha2
by Marc Delisle 30 Nov '10

30 Nov '10

Hi, Due to this bug [0] I would like to release 3.4.0-alpha2 soon. Any objection? [0] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3119884&group_id=23067&ati… -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info

3 5

[Phpmyadmin-devel] phpMyAdmin 2.11.11.1 and 3.3.8.1 are released
by Marc Delisle 29 Nov '10

29 Nov '10

Welcome to phpMyAdmin 2.11.11.1 and 3.3.8.1, two security releases. Please refer to the upcoming PMASA-2010-8 announcement on http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/security/. Download details will appear on http://phpmyadmin.net. In a hurry? you can visit http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpmyadmin to download. Marc Delisle, for the team

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] phpMyAdmin 3.4.0-alpha is released
by Marc Delisle 23 Nov '10

23 Nov '10

Welcome to the first alpha release of phpMyAdmin 3.4.0. This release contains new features, especially: * User preferences * Relation schema export to multiple formats * ENUM/SET editor * Simplified interface for export/import * AJAXification of some parts * Charts * Visual query builder Details will appear on http://phpmyadmin.net. In a hurry? you can visit http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpmyadmin to download. Marc Delisle, for the team

2 1

[Phpmyadmin-devel] QA_3_4
by Dieter Adriaenssens 23 Nov '10

23 Nov '10

Hi Marc, I noticed you created several branches preparing for the 3.4.0 release. Are there any guidelines for merging? For instance, when I fix a bug in QA_3_3, should it be applied to MAINT_3_4, QA_3_4 and master? Or will from now on, only security fixes be applied to QA_3_3? -- Kind regards, Dieter Adriaenssens

3 5

Re: [Phpmyadmin-devel] [Phpmyadmin-git] [SCM] phpMyAdmin branch, QA_3_3, updated. RELEASE_3_3_8-14-g5f4604c
by Dieter Adriaenssens 15 Nov '10

15 Nov '10

2010/11/15 Marc Delisle <marc(a)infomarc.info>: > Dieter Adriaenssens a écrit : > >> Hi Marc, >> >> Apparently, your latest bugfix in QA_3_3 was not merged with master >> yet. It merged automatically when I merged my changes in QA_3_3 to >> master. >> I hope this is not a problem. >> > Hi Dieter, > in my tests, the fix was not needed for master. I'll test again to ensure > that the "fix" does not make things worse. Hi Marc, OK, was there a way I could have avoided this accidental merge? Usually I just do $git merge QA_3_3 in master after a commit to the QA_3_3 branch. (As mentioned on the developers wiki [0]) There is a possibility of just merging the commit, instead of the branch. But I guess that this is an exceptional case were a patch in QA_3_3 didn't have to be applied to master, so the procedure as mentioned on the wiki is still valid (and the more straight forward one). [0] http://wiki.phpmyadmin.net/pma/Devel:Git#Committing_fixes_to_several_branch… Kind regards, Dieter

2 1

[Phpmyadmin-devel] about "Ignore duplicate rows"
by Marc Delisle 06 Nov '10

06 Nov '10

Hi, In 3.4 I would like to label this option "Do not abort on INSERT error" because talking about duplicate rows is misleading. INSERT IGNORE has other effects than just continuing insertion on duplicate keys. The current message can make a user believe that no duplicate rows will be inserted even if unique keys are not properly defined. -- Marc Delisle http://infomarc.info

1 0

[Phpmyadmin-devel] Query about Charts in server status page project
by AKASH NAWANI 01 Nov '10

01 Nov '10

Can anybody tell me that the project Charts in Server Status page which was proposed in gsoc 2010 has been completed or not? Thanks & Regards AkiN

2 3